Decoding Your Myers-Briggs Personality (Part 2): Sensation & iNtuition
When you ask a person: “How do you know that?” you are asking them to draw on their perceptive trait – the second letter of the Myer-Briggs Type Indicator. This trait drives how we become interested in one thing over the other, and most importantly it determines how we understand and how we explain.
Sensation is the process of conscious awareness, and iNtuition is the process of unconscious awareness.
When you ask a person: “How do you know that?” you are asking them to draw on their perceptive trait – the second letter of the Myer-Briggs Type Indicator. This trait drives how we become interested in one thing over the other, and most importantly it determines how we understand and how we explain.
Sensation is the process of conscious awareness, and iNtuition is the process of unconscious awareness.
Everyone has some degree of both perceptive traits. iNtuitive individuals have a Sensing function that is subordinate to their iNtuition, and vice versa. However, the dominant perceptive trait reflects the primary way a person perceives his/her world.
The perceptive processes are not simply passive in their nature. They are generative -- helping the individual to formulate understanding and expectation. Jung said that these traits are not “mere reactive process[es] of no further importance for the object." He called them, "almost actions, which seize and shape the object...active and creative processes that [must] build into the object just as much as they take out.”
The Sensation and iNtuition represent fundamental differences in how individuals interpret their environment and how they interpret themselves. Sensers see the world as it is, and iNtuitives see the world as it might be. It may be because of this fundamental difference that people tend to relate best with others that share their same perceptive trait. Indeed, the opposite is also true; i.e. iNtuitves may find Sensers too literal and unimaginative, while Sensers may find iNtuitives too abstract and unrealistic.
SENSATION
Sensers focus on the present, concrete details, and are primarily oriented toward what is available to them through their five senses.
The Sense trait is directly to-do with how an individual perceives present reality to actually exist. They are concerned with seeing the world as it is, accurately and without affectation.
"His ideal is the actual, [and] he has no ideals related to ideas.”
Because of this, Sensers are more likely to seek out concrete and (seemingly) definitive ways of understanding things. They will favor explanations that are grounded in what is provable rather than what "could be."
For example, a Senser would be more likely to attribute the cause of a headache to skipping breakfast (which is provable) than to stress (which is less provable).
Regarding individuals with this trait, Jung writes: “Nothing can be more than concrete and actual; conjectures that transcend, or go beyond the concrete, are only permitted on condition that they enhance sensation [or what is real]."
As well, Sensers are more likely to be drawn to things that "appeal to the senses." That is, things that are objectively and presently appealing, rather than things that are potentially or relatedly appealing. For example, someone with a Sense dominant trait would more likely be interested in buying a well-maintained, furnished house over a promising fixer-upper.
In some cases, when someone with a strong S trait experiences a sensation that is out of line with reality – whether due to their unacknowledged intuition or some type of unconscious desire – Sensers may insist that their subjective perception is the objective truth. This is a type of projection -- a defense mechanism. Consider a painter, who after a frightening encounter with an unfriendly dog, produces a painting of the dog as snarling and foaming at the mouth with oversized teeth and beady eyes. The Sensing painter may well insist the depiction is a true to form: an objective and unexaggerated account. When in truth, the dog likely appeared far less menacing. The Senser’s intuition about the dog has unconsciously influenced what he believes to be an objective understanding.
INTUITION
If the role of Sensation is to "discover the realities" of the objective situation, then the role of iNtuition is to "discover the possibilities" of that same situation. iNtuition helps us see beyond the literal data of our objective sensations. It is responsible for our ability to make connections, predict, and understand things outside of what is immediately evident.
Jung notes that while the iNtuitive does have sensations, she “is not guided by them per se, merely using them as directing-points for [her] distant vision.”
Unlike the Senser, the iNtuitive is oriented by this expanded vision, rather than by what arouses the strongest physiological sensation. Instead, the iNtuitive is directed towards sensations that are expanded by her unconscious knowledge and attitudes.
For example, a woman with a strong iNtuitive trait might be drawn to a particular dress that appeals to her because it (unconsciously) reminds her of her mother, or perhaps some other fond association. That is to say, the dress has not stood out in an objective sense – e.g. the dress is the brightest, best cut, most popular, least expensive, etc.
In many cases the iNtuitive will be unaware of the many of the contingencies driving their interest, since much of the related content may be unconscious to them or at least "subconscious." In these cases, when the iNtuitive woman is asked why she like a particular dress, she may believe that her interest is based on (objective) sensations (i.e., “I like it because it’s the most beautiful") or she may be unclear as to specific source of her interest, and simply acknowledge: “I don’t know; I just liked it.”
In this way, you might call iNtuitives less connected to the present situation, focusing not on what is immediately in front of them, but instead bringing-to-bare an unconscious culmination of their past experiences, which is overlaid into their initial perception of reality in order to predict its course or envision the whole.
“The intuitive is represented by a certain attitude of expectation: a perceptive and penetrating vision, wherein only the subsequent result can prove, in every case, how much was ‘perceived-into’.”
This, of course, has its draw-backs, as attending to "what could be" often defers attending to "what is." This type of looking to the future can also bring with it a persistent dissatisfaction with things as they are. As Jung notes, “because his eye is constantly ranging for new possibilities, stable conditions have an air of impending suffocation.”
-----
Both traits have their strengths and their weaknesses. Sensation helps us to see things objectively, as they are in the present. While, iNtuition helps us to see beyond what is obvious and envision what might be. They are not unlike the rods and cones in our eyes, whose similar and yet specialized functions enhance and complement one another.
In Jung's view, the complementary relationship in these traits is transpersonal in nature – helping the whole of humanity achieve balance between “what is” and “what might be.”
Do the descriptions above match your experience being a Senser or an iNtuitive? If so/not, let me know by comment or tweet.
In Part 3, I'll talk about the third letter of the Myers-Briggs, the Judging traits: Thinking and Feeling.
Decoding Your Myers-Briggs Personality (Part 1): Extroversion & Introversion
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) has become one of the most popular personality tests around. Thousands, if not millions, of people have taken some version of the psychological assessment based on the findings of Carl Jung. Some of these sites offer credible descriptions of the overall personality types, they rarely provide any information about the individual personality traits and their interactions with one another. So, here I skip descriptions of the sixteen Myers-Briggs types and instead focus on the eight individual traits that make up each the Myers-Briggs types.
Introduction: Carl Jung and the Myers-Briggs.
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) has become one of the most popular personality tests around. Thousands, if not millions, of people have taken some version of the psychological assessment based on the findings of Carl Jung. Some of these sites offer credible descriptions of the overall personality types, they rarely provide any information about the individual personality traits and their interactions with one another. So, here I skip descriptions of the sixteen Myers-Briggs types and instead focus on the eight individual traits that make up each the Myers-Briggs types.
(If you are looking for a resource that offers good descriptions of each of the personality types, this one is my favorite: https://www.personalitypage.com/html/portraits.html )
Before going on, I should make clear that for the purposes of this article I will refer to the full MBTI results (e.g. ENTJ, ISFP, etc) as TYPE; I will refer the individual letters that make up a type (i.e. E or I, N or S, F or T, J or P) as TRAITS; and I will refer to the interaction between traits (e.g. extraverted-intuition or Ne) as FUNCTIONS.
The traits and functions associated with the MBTI were described in 1921, in Jung’s work Psychological Types. In it he suggests that differences in personality are biologically innate and represent fundamental (rather than superficial) ways that human character varies from individual to individual. He goes on to describe the evolutionary benefits of this type of variability within any given population, making the case that our diverse characters have been vital to the advancement of humanity.
Extroversion & Introversion
The first two traits Jung discusses are the EXTROVERT and the INTROVERT. The original distinction between the two goes deeper than whether or not a person enjoys a lively party. Jung described extroversion and introversion as the “general attitude” of a person. It describes how an individual is generally oriented in the world – towards the objective (in the case of the extrovert) or towards the subjective (in the case of the introvert). This general attitude will also affect how the other personality traits are felt and expressed.
The extrovert is defined by a dominant orientation toward the outside, objective world. The extrovert’s direct and immediate attention is drawn toward things external him, and in extreme cases may altogether disregard his own subjective experience. In this way, he can be blind to his own well being and the effect that he has on others. For the extrovert the world consists primarily of the things directly in front of him. Jung writes, "[the extrovert's] consciousness looks outwards to the world, because important and decisive determination always comes to him from without. But it comes to him from without only because that is where he expects it."
By contrast, the introvert is defined by a dominant orientation toward the internal, subjective world. The introverts direct and immediate attention is drawn first toward their subjective experiences, and in extreme cases may altogether disregard the objective reality of what is happening. As Jung put it, “the introvert interposes a subjective view between the perception of the object and [her] own action, which [may prevent] the action from assuming a character that corresponds with the objective situation.” If the extrovert’s blind-spot is his disregard for his effect on the world around him, the introvert’s blind-spot is her disregard for objective reality in favor of their subjective experience of it.
This difference in external or internal orientation tends to have a noticeable impact on the behavior of extroverts as compared to introverts. Extroverts tend to find it relatively easy to tune into their immediate situation and adapt to it; however, introverts tend to find these same settings taxing, as it requires them to engage the external world with little time to “interpose a subjective view.” Conversely, extroverts may become easily bored or uneasy when their external world offers them little to interact with – for instance when they are alone. This is because for the extrovert, turning his attention inward may be as taxing to him as a lively party would be to an introvert.
Another way of saying this is that extroverts engage in the outside world with relatively little direction or effort; while introverts engage in their internal world in this same way. The result is that extroverts may appear to be more social, reckless, connected, and impulsive; whereas, introverts may appear to be more reserved, thoughtful, aloof, and measured.
As I tell my students: “Introverts prefer to look before they leap; Extroverts just leap.”
In the next part, I'll explain the differences between the differences between Sensation and iNtuition. In the mean time, let me know how your experiences of Introversion or Extroversion.